'Dust in the air' scuppers hi-tech counting system
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Experiments in electronic voting were thrown into chaos when a series of technical problems caused delays and confusion across the country.
The hi-tech vote counting machines for the mayoral elections in London were worst hit and were ridiculed after being crippled by "dust in the air" or "fluff from the green baize tablecloths" placed under the machines.
Bob Hughes, the returning officer, admitted the counting process had been a fiasco. "We have had a few machines that have gone pear-shaped," Mr Hughes said.
The 168 machines, looking like giant photocopiers, should have produced a result by 5am. However, the mechanical problems meant that it took more than 15 hours to declare the result of the mayoral election.
At Stratford-on-Avon District Council, a bold experiment in which computers were used for the voting as well as the counting produced the result only half-an-hour quicker than the traditional hand counting method.
In Bury, Greater Manchester, where one ward was chosen for electronic voting, the result was declared 56 minutes after electronic polling booths closed, to the disappointment of council staff who had hoped to announce it in just five minutes.
Gerry Stoker, a politics professor at the University of Strathclyde, said: "It seems like the more hi-tech systems have failed abysmally.
"I would like people to concentrate less on the flashy technology stuff and more on trying to get extra people to vote in the first place."
Pilot voting schemes were approved in dozens of places in the country under the Representation of the People Act 2000. As well as London, electronic counting took place at five councils, three of which also tried computer voting.
A spokesman for the Home Office said: "These were pilot projects and were never going to be 100 per cent successful. The idea was to find out what works and what doesn't.
"In a way, it's quite helpful if one or two have technical problems because it helps us learn from our mistakes."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments