Donald Macintyre's Sketch: No bombast as members on all sides drift away from Israel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In the end, even the tone of the Palestine debate made you think there might indeed be something historic about it.
Odd, since it was on a backbench motion that, as its proposer Grahame Morris of Labour admitted, wouldn’t change a single fact on the ground. Partly it was that Morris himself, arguing quietly for the “small but symbolic” step of recognising Palestine, kept not passion but bombast in check. But it was the Tory Richard Ottaway who should most worry an Israeli leadership which had done its best to prevent a vote for recognition last night. The Foreign Affairs Committee chairman described how some of his wife’s family had been with Chaim Weizmann at the Paris Peace Conference; how he had grown up deeply influenced by the Holocaust, and how as a young midshipman had swept the Tiran straits for mines after the Six Day War –which he denounced as a “major attempt to destroy Israel”. He had “stuck with Israel through thick and thin”.
But in the past 20 years, he said with deep regret, Israel had been “drifting away from world public opinion”. The recent “annexation of 950 acres of the West Bank… has enraged me more than anything in my political life”, he said. While he doubted that the Palestinians were yet “fit” for statehood, he was just too angry to oppose Morris’s motion. And, he concluded, if Israel is “losing people like me, it’s going to be losing a lot of people”.
Opponents included the former Foreign Secretary Malcolm Rifkind who said Britain had not recognised Israel until 1950, long after the war of 1948, and that it was abnormal to recognise a state without trappings like an army.
His speech and that of Labour’s Louise Ellman – who strangely appeared to blame Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas alone for the collapse of negotiations – were strikingly more negative even than the Government’s official line, reserving “the right to recognise a Palestinian state bilaterally at a moment of our choosing and when it can best help bring about peace”.
That was tellingly recalled by former Labour Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who then simply added: “That moment is now.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments