Dilemma of congestion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The need to cope with the growing congestion crisis has been the motivating force behind the national transport debate, writes Christian Wolmar.
The amount of traffic was forecast to go up by between 83 per cent and 142 per cent between 1988 and 2025. The pro-roadbuilding group, the British Roads Federation, calculates that in the past 10 years, traffic has increased by an average of one-third on all roads, with 61 per cent growth on motorways.
In the introduction to the Green Paper, Sir George Young put the problem in a nutshell: "Traffic growth highlights the question of whether the aims of widening choice, of improving the competitiveness of our economy and protecting the environment ... can be reconciled."
But the paper has failed to come up with a strong programme for national government to reduce congestion. Instead, it relies on local authorities to tackle the problem.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments