Defence cuts 'threat to UN seat'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE TREASURY has been warned by the Commons Select Committee on Defence that Britain's seat on the UN Security Council could be at risk unless the Government protects defence spending for its peacekeeping role.
The report by the committee, chaired by Sir Nicholas Bonsor, a senior Tory backbench MP, will be seen as a pre-emptive strike against any attempt by the Treasury to cut deeper into the defence Budget as part of the Chancellor's attempt to reduce the pounds 50bn public sector deficit.
Its findings reinforce a weekend defence report by a group of leading Tory backbenchers, including Ian Taylor, MP for Esher, and three other ministerial aides, as part of the in- fighting over public spending.
The committee said Britain should not fear comparison in its defence capabilities with Germany and Japan, which are tipped for the UN seat. But it said there were signs that Germany and Japan were able and willing to participate in the UN peacekeeping role.
The committee argued against earmarking a special unit for peacekeeping duties, but reminded ministers that it had already warned of 'overstretch' facing infantry forces. It also warned that Britain's amphibious intervention capability was 'threadbare'; and that Britain had no airborne surveillance capability equivalent to the US JSTARS, which can identify distant ground targets and force movements.
UK Peacekeeping and intervention forces, Defence Committee, fourth report; HoC paper 188/369 HMSO; pounds 22.80.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments