Defeat over civil service Bill averted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Government averted a possible defeat in the House of Lords last night when it agreed to look again at the wording of a Bill on civil service management to allay civil servants' fears that their pay and conditions could be set by private firms, writes Stephen Goodwin.
Although Earl Howe, a junior minister, complained of 'scaremongering' when peers considered the Civil Service (Management Functions) Bill, he conceded that there were 'some problems of definition'. He also admitted that the introduction of the Bill might have appeared 'rather sudden' to civil service unions. 'With hindsight, the Government recognises that it might have been helpful to take the unions into its confidence sooner.'
The Bill gives the Treasury and the Minister for the Civil Service power to delegate management tasks to other Crown servants. Earl Howe said that the vast majority of delegations would be to ministers and agency chief executives. He insisted the measure had no bearing on market testing or contracting out, and did not allow a private sector employer to determine civil servants' terms and conditions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments