Defeat for teacher training proposals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT'S plans for school-based teacher training were heavily dented yesterday by a two- vote defeat in the House of Lords, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
The setback came during the Committee Stage of the Education Bill, which provides for a national Teacher Training Agency and changes to student unions. Peers voted 123 to 121 for a Labour amendment ensuring schools can only run teacher-training courses in partnership with, and accredited by, higher education institutions.
The amendment was moved by Lord Judd, Labour's education spokesman in the Lords, who said afterwards: 'The House has voted for teacher education, of which training is only a part, as the basis for our teachers to learn their profession, not for the Government's cheap and nasty concept of classroom technicians.'
Ann Taylor, Labour's education spokesperson, said: 'After the embarrassing climbdown over student union reforms, there is nothing left to argue about. John Patten should withdraw this divisive and unnecessary Bill immediately.'
But Baroness Blatch, Minister of State for Education, indicated that the Government would seek to reverse the defeat when the Bill reaches the Commons.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments