Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Decisions on closures of hospitals to be postponed

Nicholas Timmins,Political Correspondent
Wednesday 14 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MINISTERS are to postpone decisions on which London hospitals should close until early in the New Year, it emerged yesterday, the day before the Tomlinson report on the future of the capital's health care was expected to land on their desks.

The report, which is understood to recommend closure of St Bartholomew's, either St Thomas's or Guy's, and widespread rationalisations and closures elsewhere, is intended to be published before the end of the month, and possibly next week.

But Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health, plans no announcements on decisions, leaving the report for consultation until the end of the year. Decisions on hospital closures are not expected until about January .

Even then, another period of consultation on each proposed closure is required by law before firm decisions can be taken.

With many London hospitals and the British Medical Association having accepted the need for change, and with some London hospitals and health authorities already proposing defensive rationalisations, ministers hope the delay will help to promote acceptance of deeply unpopular decisions affecting some of London's most famous medical names.

Brian Mawhinney, Minister for Health, said yesterday that a further 121 hospitals and units had expressed interest in becoming National Health Service trusts in 1994.

If all were to apply and be approved, 95 per cent of core hospital and community services will have become self-governing by that date, he said.

He maintained that the new applications were 'clearly based on the benefits (trust status) can bring to patients and NHS staff'.

Trusts, he argued, were 'an obvious return to first principles - decisions based on local needs, made by local managers with the full involvement of senior professional staff'. He said it was nonsense to believe that the competition they introduced meant the first priority of every manager was 'to engineer the downfall of all other hospitals'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in