Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

David Cameron urged to reveal list of visitors entertained at Chequers

Shadow Cabinet Office ministercondems publication of “annual” guest list

Jane Merrick
Saturday 18 January 2014 15:19 EST
Comments
Michael Dugher condemned the publication of the “annual” Chequers guest list, which was over a year late when it was quietly released on Friday evening
Michael Dugher condemned the publication of the “annual” Chequers guest list, which was over a year late when it was quietly released on Friday evening

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Cameron must publish full details of his guests to his taxpayer-funded country home Chequers, Labour said today.

In a letter to the Prime Minister, shadow Cabinet Office minister Michael Dugher condemned the publication of the “annual” Chequers guest list, which was over a year late when it was quietly released on Friday evening.

The list only included guests who attended the Buckinghamshire grace-and-favour mansion at a cost to the taxpayer, and not the dozens whose visits were funded privately. Mr Dugher wrote that because Chequers is a public building and access to it is part of the Prime Minister’s privileges, the names of all guests should be revealed. Mr Cameron should also publish guests to Downing Street.

The MP for Barnsley East wrote: “The fact that the Conservative party may have nominally paid to host various people at Chequers cannot be used as a device to block transparency in relation to lobbyists and others gaining access to the Prime Minister and senior Government ministers.

“It appears that there is an attempt to buy out of transparency, which leaves the perception of a Chequers cover-up and reinforces the view that you are out of touch and consistently stand up for the wrong people.

“This also follows repeated refusals to give any details of meetings with Lynton Crosby, someone who we know is a paid lobbyist working for, amongst others, the cigarette industry.”

But the Tories hit back, accusing Labour of “hypocrisy” because Ed Miliband had promised to publish regular updates on his meetings with union general secretaries - yet the last time this happened was in March 2012.

A Tory source added: “We have been the most transparent Government ever, publishing expenses over £500 online and details of ministerial meetings. This is Grade A hypocrisy from Dugher but we would expect nothing less from one of Damian McBride’s apprentices.”

The published list reveals Mr Cameron entertained the emir of Qatar, which is hosting the 2022 World Cup, the provost of Eton and a string of Conservative and Liberal Democrat ministers. A separate list of guests to Chevening, Nick Clegg’s luxury entertaining mansion, reveals politicians, journalists and TV personalities, including a brace of national treasures - Joanna Lumley and Clare Balding.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in