Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Daily Star' sets 5pm deadline for repayment of £3m

Kim Sengupta
Tuesday 23 November 1999 19:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lord Archer must repay the £3m in damages, costs and interest he earned from his 1987 libel case against the Daily Star by 5pm tomorrow, or face legal action, the newspaper said yesterday.

Lord Archer must repay the £3m in damages, costs and interest he earned from his 1987 libel case against the Daily Star by 5pm tomorrow, or face legal action, the newspaper said yesterday.

Express Newspapers, the owner of the paper, has instructed lawyers to prepare an application for the Court of Appeal that could reopen the verdict reached 13 years ago, on the basis of fresh evidence.

If no agreement is reached on repayment for the demanded amount, legal experts expect the Daily Star to be granted leave to appeal. The sum consists of £500,000 in damages, £700,000 in costs, and 13 years' accrued interest.

Peter Hill, the newspaper's editor, said: "We are very serious about this. We have hired the best lawyers. They are going through all the evidence again. We are also considering information that has come to the Daily Star in the past two days from several sources. Some of this is very interesting.... If the jury had known Archer had persuaded his friend to lie for him they would have been far less likely to believe the rest of the evidence."

Lord Archer withdrew his candidacy for mayor of London on Saturday after he admitted asking Ted Francis, a friend, to provide him with a false alibi for an evening he was alleged to have spent with Monica Coghlan, a prostitute.

"A very big part of the (libel) case was the fact that Jeffrey Archer had a wonderful and ideal marriage. That is now beginning to look much less true," Mr Hill added.

The newspaper is said to have been approached by at least one former juror in Lord Archer's trial, saying he would have voted differently had he been aware of the plot to concoct an alibi. A fresh trial will lead to details of the allegations against Lord Archer being reopened. They include that he had sex with Ms Coghlan.

For William Hague, this brings the shuddering prospect of Tory sleaze dominating the headlines again, despite his recent attempts to draw a line under the subject.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in