Urgent action needed to replace cladding after Dagenham fire, Grenfell report author warns
Dame Judith Hackitt criticises ‘buck passing’ for slow progress on repairs in seven years since disaster
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Urgent action is needed to replace dangerous cladding in the wake of a major fire at a tower block in east London, the author of a report into the Grenfell Tower disaster has warned.
Dame Judith Hackitt, who led a government review on building safety after the deadly Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, said it is “really concerning” that so many people are still living in uncertainty and fear about their homes and that it was “very lucky” nobody died in Monday’s blaze.
Fire ripped through the tower block in Dagenham, which was undergoing “remedial” work to remove and replace “non-compliant cladding” on the fifth and sixth floors containing flats, according to a planning application document.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Dame Judith criticised those who have been “passing the buck” on the issue of fixing buildings seven years on from the Grenfell fire, which killed 72 people.
“This really about people passing the buck, passing it up the chain and the work has to be done,” she said. “This must be about identifying those responsible and making them pay.”
Cabinet Office minister Ellie Reeves said work to remove dangerous cladding from buildings needs to be “ramped up”.
Pressed on when remediation work will be completed, Ms Reeves told Today: “It’s important that developers are doing what they ought to be doing in relation to remediation works, and where they are not action is taken.
“My understanding is that in blocks with Grenfell-style cladding, something like 88 per cent of remedial works have been completed. There is further to go in blocks with other sorts of cladding that need remedial work.
“But, as I say, I know that the housing minister is looking at this and remediation work needs to be ramped up.”
An investigation into the Dagenham fire has begun and questions around the role of cladding will “form part” of the probe, the London Fire Brigade’s (LFB) assistant commissioner Patrick Goulbourne said.
LFB commissioner, Andy Roe, said on Monday there were “fire safety issues present within the building”.
More than 80 people were evacuated and two were taken to hospital after the blaze broke out.
Labour MP for Dagenham and Rainham Margaret Mullane said: “There needs to be a full investigation into the cause of this fire, and why, seven years on from Grenfell, unsafe cladding was still in the process of being removed.
“However, my initial actions will be to help the victims of this terrible tragedy, all in absolute shock, as they are moved into temporary accommodation and begin the process of rebuilding their lives.”
A government spokesperson added: “We must establish the facts surrounding this horrific incident. That is why we are urgently working with the London Fire Brigade and local council to understand exactly what happened and ask if more needs to be done to keep people safe in their homes.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments