Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cummings says Boris Johnson had ‘possibly illegal’ secret plan to fund Downing Street flat refurbishments

“I refused to help him organise these payments”, PMs former aide says

Vincent Wood
Friday 23 April 2021 14:29 EDT
Comments
Mr Cummings has alleged that the Boris Johnson stopped discussing the matter with him after he questioned the ethics of soliciting funds to do up the residence shared by the PM
Mr Cummings has alleged that the Boris Johnson stopped discussing the matter with him after he questioned the ethics of soliciting funds to do up the residence shared by the PM (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dominic Cummings has said the PM planned to have donors secretly pay for the renovation of his Downing Street Flat - a bid the former aid described as “unethical, foolish” and “possibly illegal”.

A refit to the premises caused controversy earlier this year after leaked emails appeared to show that Conservative party donors had put up money for the project - a charge denied by No. 10.

However in an explosive blog post by his former aide, Mr Cummings has alleged that the Boris Johnson stopped discussing the matter with him after he questioned the ethics of soliciting funds to do up the residence shared by the PM, his partner Carrie Symonds, and their baby Wilf.

Referring to suggestions that he was behind the leaking of information around the financing of the project, Mr Cummings wrote: “The PM stopped speaking to me about this matter in 2020 as I told him I thought his plans to have donors secretly pay for the renovation were unethical, foolish, possibly illegal and almost certainly broke the rules on proper disclosure of political donations if conducted in the way he intended. “

He added: “I refused to help him organise these payments. My knowledge about them is therefore limited.

“I would be happy to tell the Cabinet Secretary or Electoral Commission what I know concerning this matter. “

In March the Electoral Commission was forced to investigate reports the Conservative party had put forward a £60,000 payment for the renovation of the prime ministerial address.

At the time Johnson fell short of denying reports he had sought donors to pay for the refurbishment, saying that “all such inquiries will be answered with normal declarations in the normal way”

However Downing Street has since said the PM paid for the work on the flat above Number 11 where he lives out of his own pocket.

In a statement to parliament provided on the same day as Mr Cummings’ attack, Cabinet Office minister Lord True said that works took place during the 2020/21 financial year on painting, sanding and floorboards in the flat.

He did not give a figure for the spending, but said: “Any costs of wider refurbishment in this year have been met by the prime minister personally.”

Labour’s Rachel Reeves MP, called for a full investigation into the claims made by the PM’s former aide.

She said: “There is something deeply suspect about how Boris Johnson and the government have been trying to cover up the luxury refurbishment of No.10. 

“Throughout the course of the last year the government has been repeatedly evasive about who has been paying for the refurbishment. That leaves far too many questions marks over potential special favours that could have been cashed in on the back of that donation. 

“Given we know it only takes a text from one of the Prime Minister’s chums to get a tax break, what might a discreet donation for a luxury refurbishment might get you?”

A No 10 spokesperson said: “At all times, the government and ministers have acted in accordance with the appropriate codes of conduct and electoral law. Cabinet Office officials have been engaged and informed throughout and official advice has been followed.

“All reportable donations are transparently declared and published – either by the Electoral Commission or the House of Commons registrar, in line with the requirements set out in electoral law.

“Gifts and benefits received in a ministerial capacity are, and will continue to be, declared in transparency returns.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in