Expenses of Tory MP who defeated Nigel Farage in election may have been forged, court told
Craig Mackinlay is on trial alongside his staff after they were accused of overspending
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Conservative MP's expenses form for his general election campaign may have been forged, a handwriting expert has told the politician's trial.
Craig Mackinlay, 52, is on trial alongside his staff after they were accused of overspending in his successful bid to beat the then Ukip leader Nigel Farage to the seat of South Thanet, Kent, in 2015.
Mr Mackinlay, his election agent, Nathan Gray, 29, and campaign manager, Marion Little, 63, have all denied deliberately filing false expenditure returns.
Mr Gray's signature appeared on the declaration form but Oliver Thorne, a forensic scientist specialising in handwriting, said this was an "imitation" and that there were also "significant differences" to show the writing on the form was forged too.
The culprit is not likely to be Ms Little or Mr Mackinlay, he added.
Mr Mackinlay, an accountant by profession, was elected to Parliament on 7 May 2015 with a majority of around 2,800. His declared spending came in under the strict £52,000 limit.
But jurors have been told his victory could have been made void if up to £66,000 of undeclared spending on staffing, accommodation and advertising was included on returns.
Mr Mackinlay denies two charges of making a false election expenses declaration under the Representation of the People Act 1983.
Ms Little denies three counts of intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007.
Mr Gray denies one charge of making a false election expenses declaration and a further charge of using a false instrument under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981.
The defendants are all on bail while the trial, expected to last until December, continues.