Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ministers warned over 'botched' plans to privatise court fines collections

Exclusive: MoJ faces anger from businesses over claims the tender for the £290m deal is being skewed in favour of a single national contract

Lizzy Buchan
Political Correspondent
Monday 20 November 2017 06:56 EST
Comments
David Lidington arrives at Downing Street in London
David Lidington arrives at Downing Street in London (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Ministry of Justice has been accused of presiding over “another botched” tender on a deal that could allow private firms to arrest people who dodge court-imposed fines.

Under contracts believed to be worth £290m, powers to detain people for failing to pay fines and community penalties would be handed from civilian enforcement officers employed by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Services (HMCTS) to private security officials.

The tender document – published quietly by the MoJ in August – said it would explore the “potential transfer of service of all warrants” from civil service officials, widening the powers available to private bailiffs.

Business insiders believe the tender has been skewed to favour a single national contract for a large firm over smaller local providers, prompting questions over the competitiveness and transparency of the process.

The MoJ has come under fire in the past over the outsourcing of contracts to private security firms such as Serco and G4S, the latter of which won a multi-million contract for electronic tagging of offenders despite being investigated for overcharging the Government for similar services.

An industry insider told The Independent: “Moving to one national contract for the services of approved enforcement agencies [AEAs] is unprecedented when you think about the structure of the current market.

“Regional contracts delivered by multiple suppliers will allow for more flexibility and offer more bespoke solutions to specific regional challenges.

“That model would also, through competition, improve collection rates and consequently increase revenue to the taxpayer.

“The Government should stick to regional lots for AEA services to maintain the effectiveness and integrity of the justice system and to avoid yet another botched public tendering exercise.”

The plans come after a failed attempt to outsource the collection of court fines to an American conglomerate cost the taxpayer nearly £9m in 2015, according to figures released to Parliament.

Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon urged the Government to abandon the “flawed idea”, which he said would put more vulnerable people at risk of becoming victims of rogue private bailiffs.

He said: “From the growing failures in the part-privatised probation system to the scandal surrounding G4S tagging contracts, the Conservative Government’s obsession with privatisation has already caused enough harm to our justice system.

“The Government has previously wasted millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money trying to privatise enforcement. The concerns already being raised about this tender process underline why the Government should never have resurrected this flawed idea.

“It should scrap these plans to outsource civilian enforcement, which risks more and more people becoming victim of rogue private bailiffs, as weaker oversight is combined with pressure to maximise profits.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “HM Courts and Tribunal Services upholds high standards in its procurement process in line with Cabinet Office guidance to ensure there is no inbuilt bias.

“It is designed to ensure a fair and transparent outcome which delivers the best possible deal for the taxpayer.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in