Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Counties advance their case

Ngaio Crequer
Wednesday 24 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IF ENGLAND wants unitary local government then county councils are the 'sitting tenants', Robin Wendt, secretary of the Association of County Councils, said yesterday, writes Ngaio Crequer.

He said that with counties controlling nearly 90 per cent of spending in the shires, they are already the 'next best thing to unitary authorities'.

He told a meeting of council leaders in London that 'all sides agree that with county unitary authorities, local government running costs can be cut by 23 per cent by eliminating expensive district bureaucracies: a much better way of saving the taxpayer's money than cutting unemployment or invalidity benefit'.

The Local Government Commission is considering new unitary authorities to replace the two-tier system of district and county councils.

'The review is not and never has been about the future of district councils. Their case for a general system of unitary districts has been roundly dismissed as it was always going to be. They have utterly failed with the commission.'

This was why it was being suggested that districts merge with counties. 'There is little reason to suppose that the districts will cut any more ice with the commission in pairs than they have done singly,' Mr Wendt said. 'We should have nothing to do with the murky, muddled, middle ground of merged districts.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in