Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Coronavirus: £1,000 fine for falsely reporting a contact to force them to self-isolate

Pubs and bars face penalties for playing loud music or allowing singing and dancing 

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Monday 28 September 2020 14:27 EDT
Comments
Coronavirus in numbers

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anyone falsely naming an antagonist as a coronavirus contact in order to force them to self-isolate can be fined £1,000, under new regulations coming into force today, which also ban pubs and bars from playing loud music or allowing people to sing and dance.

The new offences are among a string of new restrictions included without fanfare in legislation published yesterday, just hours before they came into effect.

And ministers came under fire from a former Conservative chief whip for failing to inform MPs and the public before they became law.

Health secretary Matt Hancock was forced onto the defensive in the House of Commons by a string of Tory MPs who said the poorly-communicated offences were proof that ministers should introduce restrictions only after a parliamentary debate and vote.

Former chief whip Mark Harper told him: “[These were] 12 pages of detailed laws, with lots of detail and criminal offences and duties – including duties on employers and directors and officers with serious criminal penalties. 

“That’s why we need to scrutinise the detail of the legislation before it comes into force and give our assent to it, not just allow you to do so by decree.”

Mr Hancock responded:  “Sometimes in this pandemic we have had to move fast, and we may need to again. 

“The challenge we have in this House is how to ensure proper scrutiny, whilst also being able when necessary to move fast in response to the virus.”

New fines for failure to self-isolate, starting at £1,000 for a first offence and rising to as much as £10,000 after four breaches, were well publicised in advance.

But details of the legislation have now revealed that the penalty on a first offence can be quadrupled to £4,000 if the breach is committed “recklessly”.

This could involve someone who knows they are infective and has been told to remain away from others deliberately going to a workplace or pub or onto public transport where they expect to come into contact with people who they might infect.

Meanwhile, anyone giving false information to a test and trace official could be issued with a fixed penalty notice of £1,000 for a first offence, rising to £10,000 for a fourth repeat.

The legislation makes clear that fines can be imposed for “falsely stating … that someone is a close contact of a person who has tested positive for coronavirus”, making it illegal to maliciously attempt to use the system to force an enemy into self-isolation.

But it is understood that the ban on giving “false information” would also catch someone who omitted to mention that they had been in close contact with a friend or relative, in the hope of helping them escape the need to go into a 14-day quarantine.

Employees could face a £50 fine if they fail to tell their bosses that they have been told to self-isolate.

This measure is intended to ensure employers cannot claim ignorance if they are subjected to a £1,000 fine for allowing self-isolating staff to attend their workplace.

In addition, the guidance for hospitality venues such as pubs, bars and restaurants to avoid loud music, singing and dancing has now become a legal requirement.

The new regulations state that venues must not play recorded music above 85 decibels – around the volume of an alarm clock, power tool or lawnmower. Live music will continue to be permitted above this volume.

New bans prevent groups of more than six people singing as well as any dancing on the premises by customers.

The only exemptions on the dancing ban are at wedding or civil partnership receptions, and even then only the happy couple themselves are allowed to take to the dance floor.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in