Coronavirus: Andy Burnham wants to shut down Tesco stores failing to enforce face mask rules
Greater Manchester mayor asked for powers to shut venues which are not Covid-secure
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andy Burnham has said he would like to shut down Tesco supermarket branches in which fail to enforce face mask use by customers.
The Greater Manchester mayor revealed he has asked for new powers from government to close venues which do not observe rules designed to make them Covid-secure.
And he named the grocery giant as one chain which he believes has failed to act responsibly.
Under government rules, shoppers in England - with certain exemptions - must wear face-coverings while inside a store or supermarket, with police able to impose a £200 fine on those who do not.
The official guidance does not require stores to enforce the rule, but says they should “take reasonable steps to promote compliance with the law”.
But Mr Burnham told the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee he believed the companies should be responsible for making sure shoppers follow the rules.
And he said that targeting venues which fail to make themselves Covid-safe could have more effect on beating the virus than the blanket closure of pubs bars and other businesses imposed by the government when Manchester went into tier 3 restrictions last week.
Giving evidence to peers on his negotiations with ministers, Mr Burnham said: “We argued for a more targeted approach to venues.
“We asked for summary closure powers of all business premises that were not deemed to be Covid-safe.
“I'm not just talking about pubs and restaurants. There are large supermarkets in Greater Manchester who in my view have not properly implemented the requirements around face coverings.
“And I'll name one chain - Tesco. I don't believe they have taken the responsible attitude to this issue.
“They've said it's not for them to enforce. I think it is for those organisations to enforce.
“So we have asked for targeted summary closure powers to be able to temporarily close venues which we do not believe are adhering properly to the protocol.
"And we think that would be a better approach than just blanket restrictions that may or may not have the impact that the government wants on the virus.”
Mr Burnham said that Manchester’s experience over the past few months suggested that targeting venues which refuse to enforce face mask use, coupled with shielding of the most vulnerable residents, could work better than the restrictions on social and economic life imposed by the government on the city
“We’ve been under those restrictions for three months,” said Mr Burnham. “So together with Leicester, we probably have more experience with local restrictions than anywhere.
“And our view is they may have dampened the number of cases, but they haven't actually succeeded in turning the situation around.
“We think the ability to act in a more targeted way, both in terms of shielding but also in terms of enforcement, would be a more sensible approach.”
A Tesco spokesperson said: “Customers must wear face coverings when they shop in our stores, and everyone has their part to play in this, unless they are exempt in line with government guidance.
"We have clear signage explaining this, and we have packs of face coverings available for purchase near the front of our stores for any customers who have forgotten them.
“The government has set out reasons why customers may be exempt from wearing face coverings and has made clear that it is for the police, rather than individual retailers, to enforce this or determine if an exemption applies. Our colleagues do not have enforcement powers, and asking them to do this would put them at increased risk of verbal and physical abuse.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments