Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Coronavirus: People face ‘destitution’ and may have to ‘prostitute themselves’ without more help, former adviser warns

'Do we want to go back to the days where people can't put shoes on the children's feet?’

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 15 October 2020 04:23 EDT
Comments
Louise Casey warns of 'destitution' in Covid hotspots

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People face ‘destitution’ and may have to ‘prostitute themselves’ unless the Chancellor offers more Covid help, a former homelessness adviser is warning.

Louise Casey hit out at Rishi Sunak’s aid package – paying only two-thirds of workers’ wages at shut-down firms – saying she had never been more worried about rising poverty.

Warning the offer would not “cut it”, the adviser to both Conservative and Labour governments said: “We are looking at a period of destitution.”

She added: “Do we want to go back to the days where people can't put shoes on the children's feet?

“Are we actually asking people in places like Liverpool to go out and prostitute themselves, so that they could put food on the table?”

The criticism comes as local leaders across the North refuse to accept the toughest lockdown restrictions, unless Mr Sunak rethinks the deep income cuts workers would face.

The furlough scheme – which ends on 31 October – has seen government and firms together paying up to 80 per cent of wages, up to a maximum of £2,500 a month.

But its replacement, the job support scheme, will contribute only 77 per cent of their pay, with companies told they must pay the larger share.

In areas entering tier three restrictions, 67 per cent of wages will be paid by the government – but only to firms ordered to close completely.

“It's like you're saying to people, 'You can only afford two-thirds of your rent, you can only afford two-thirds of the food that you need to put on the table', Dame Louise said.

“There's this sense from Downing Street and from Westminster that people will make do. Well, they weren't coping before Covid.”

The attack, from an independent respected figure, will be powerful ammunition for Labour which has also demanded that workers are not penalised for lockdowns imposed because of the virus.

Mr Sunak is worried about the extraordinary cost to the Treasury of maintaining that help, with the Budget deficit heading for a peacetime record of more than £300bn.

The government is expected to impose three tier restrictions on Greater Manchester and Lancashire without significant extra help – possibly triggering legal action.

An extra £20 a week was added to Universal Credit payments, but this is due to end in April – and the benefit excludes many people from any help regardless.

Dame Louise called the plight of many working people “unprecedented”, adding: “I have never worked in a situation where I'm so concerned about what's going to happen.”

But a Treasury spokesman its package of support is “in line with similar schemes provided by European counterparts.”

It had spent “more than £9bn in making our welfare system more generous", with increases both in Universal Credit and local housing allowance.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in