Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cook falls into line on axing Clause IV

Patricia Wynn Davies
Tuesday 24 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In a key development in Tony Blair's campaign to rewrite Labour's constitution, Robin Cook, the shadow Foreign Secretary, will today publicly bury his former opposition to scrapping the Clause IV "common ownership" provision, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.

Within the Shadow Cabinet, Mr Cook was its most outspoken critic of Mr Blair's determination to replace the clause. His conversion, to be set out in a keynote speech in Westminster, will boost the Labour leader's mission while coming as a blow to the left, who have traditionally viewed Mr Cook as their standard-bearer.

In the speech, he will admit he was initially opposed to the change but has now come round to the view that it is very much needed, and will highlight what he now accepts are "many curious omissions" from the clause, including equality, solidarity, demo cracy and social justice.

Mr Cook will say that Sidney Webb, author of the clause in 1918, would be amazed if he came back now and found it unchanged.

He will go on to remark that that "public ownership is not the sole objective of socialism" and Clause IV should not be "pickled in vinegar". Labour's ideology rests not on state ownership but on social solidarity, he will declare.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in