Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Concerns at MoD over minister's private briefings to the Murdochs

 

Oliver Wright
Wednesday 27 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Government officials last night questioned the "unusual" private defence briefings Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for Defence, has given to Rupert and James Murdoch – briefings which were in stark contrast to the practice at the end of the previous government.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has revealed that on three occasions since the Coalition came to power in May 2010, members of the Murdoch family have been given "defence briefings" by Dr Fox and senior military officials.

The meetings took place in August last year and in March and June this year. An MoD spokesman refused to go into detail of what was discussed but it is thought issues included Afghanistan and the Strategic Defence Review. The MoD also declined to say who asked for the briefings. The only other non-journalist from a media organisation to receive such a briefing was Murdoch MacLennan, the chief executive of the Telegraph Media Group.

Last night Bob Ainsworth, the previous secretary of state for defence, confirmed that no similar meetings had taken place when he was in office; nor had the Murdochs asked for them. "This is not something which I did," Mr Ainsworth said. Political advisers who worked in the department at the time of the Iraq war said they were unaware of any such briefings then as well. A Whitehall source said there were concerns within the MoD about a Defence Secretary giving private briefings to media proprietors. "This is not surprising to anyone who works here," the source said. "Normally a minister would take advice [from civil servants] on whether it was appropriate to discuss policy with someone from outside, and what they could discuss. But Fox's special advisers very seldom take advice on that – normally you just find out after the meeting has happened. This is a classic case."

The source added there was a difference between briefing working journalists on the background detail of policy issues, and briefing the owners of multinational media groups.

Meanwhile Lord Macdonald QC, the former director of public prosecutions, said prosecutors would have taken "firm" action five years ago if they had been shown documents suggesting the News of the World (NOTW)hacked into Milly Dowler's phone. The Independent revealed on Tuesday that Lord Macdonald, who now advises News International, had been made aware of evidence suggesting NOTW hacked a "vast array" of phones.

Yesterday in a letter to the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, Lord Macdonald said he believed the CPS was not shown 11,000 pages of documents seized from private investigator Glenn Mulcaire during the original police inquiry. Lord Macdonald wrote: "I am not clear whether this included material suggesting that Ms Milly Dowler's phone was hacked after her murder, or that the privacy of relatives of the victims of the 7/7 and of Britain's war dead may have been outrageously abused. I can only say that if prosecutors had seen any of this material in 2006, I am confident that firm and [appropriate] action would have followed."

Scotland Yard and the CPS have been criticised for not widening the scope of their original inquiry beyond Mulcaire and ex-NOTW royal editor Clive Goodman, who were both jailed for phone hacking in January 2007.

Lord Macdonald criticised Scotland Yard's failure to inform all the potential victims of phone hacking. "I understand it is an uncontested matter of record that police assured the CPS in 2006... they would contact all those potential victims... It is obviously extremely unfortunate this... did not... occur."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in