Commons peace protester wins case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An anti-war demonstrator yesterday won his battle to continue a one-man protest on the pavement opposite the House of Commons. For 16 months, Brian Haw has staged a 24-hour-a-day vigil in his self-styled "peace camp" in Parliament Square.
Westminster council took him to court, claiming he was causing an obstruction because his possessions spilled over on to the pavement by 2 feet. But Mr Justice Gray, in the High Court, ruled the obstruction was not unreasonable and refused to grant the council an injunction against Mr Haw.
He said Mr Haw's right to exercise freedom of speech had been a significant factor in reaching his conclusion.
The peace campaigner has already won support from high-profile figures including the former MP Tony Benn and the former CND leader Bruce Kent, who have sworn statements to defend his right to protest against war.
After leaving court yesterday, Mr Haw, 53, from Redditch, Worcestershire, hugged and prayed with two Buddhist monks who had mounted a vigil at London's Law Courts during the case.The council was refused leave to appeal, but can still apply directly to the Court of Appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments