Commons committee poised to back Campbell in row with BBC
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Alastair Campbell is on the point of scoring a significant victory in his campaign to force the BBC to back down over allegations that he misused material from the intelligence services.
Members of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, who were saying a week ago that they were prepared to condemn Mr Campbell's involvement in events leading up to the Iraq war, now believe he is telling the truth.
Vindication by the committee would be an important psychological boost for Tony Blair's administration. Last week, Labour's standing in opinion polls fell below that of the Conservatives for only the second time since September 1992.
The committee is likely to reject a BBC allegation that intelligence reports were "sexed up" by Mr Campbell's Downing Street staff to strengthen the case for war.
The Government's case against Iraq, which later formed the justification for war, was set out in a document presented to Parliament by Mr Blair last September.
Mr Campbell stood by that document when he gave evidence to the select committee last week, but apologised for errors in a later Downing Street publication, known as the "dodgy dossier", produced in January.
During a closed session on Friday afternoon, committee members heard evidence from the Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, which gave them a chance to compare the Government's September dossier with the secret intelligence reports on which it was based.
One committee member, who has criticised Mr Campbell before, said: "You either believe the Government or the BBC, and at the moment my view is that we go with the Government. The report will have to concentrate now on whether the intelligence that came to the Government was credible or whether the intelligence agencies themselves were misguided."
Another committee member said: "Jack Straw was pretty forthcoming, and what we heard supports what Alastair Campbell told us - though I'm not sure the BBC is ever in the business of apologising."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments