Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Civil servants ‘lobbied Sue Gray to have names removed’ from Partygate report

Up to 30 names were allegedly scheduled to appear in the report but only 15 appeared

Holly Bancroft
Sunday 29 May 2022 03:20 EDT
Comments
Sue Gray concluded her investigation into parties in Downing Street on Wednesday
Sue Gray concluded her investigation into parties in Downing Street on Wednesday (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior civil servants allegedly tried to waterdown Sue Gray’s report into Partygate and pressured her to remove names, according to reports.

Samantha Jones, the permanent secretary at No 10, reportedly discussed who should be publicly named in the report with MS Gray’s team ahead of publication.

According to the The Sunday Times, Ms Gray was lobbied to make changes on Tuesday evening by Ms Jones, cabinet secretary Simon Case, and permanent secretary in the Cabinet Office Alex Chisholm.

The report alleged that up to 30 names were scheduled to be included in the report, but in the end only 15 people featured.

A Whitehall source told the paper: “On Tuesday night, one last attempt was made to persuade her [Gray] to omit names from the report, but she made it plain to them the only way that was going to happen was if they issued her with an instruction.”

Certain details were also removed from the report, according to The Sunday Times, including references to music being played at an “Abba party” in the prime minister’s flat and the leaving times of the attendees.

Details about a leaving party for Hannah Young, a No 10 private secretary, were reportedly removed.

There was no official comment, but a No 10 source dnied that any details in the report were tweaked. “It is untrue that anyone on the political side saw anything in advance or sought to influence it,” they said.

A Downing Street official also claimed that Ms Gray had investigated whether two people were caught having sex in No 10 on the night Dominic Cummings and Lee Cain left in November 2020.

Ms Gray reportedly couldn’t find enough evidence about the alleged incident to put it in the report.

In her report, the senior civil servant said that top officials, including Boris Johnson “must bear responsibility for this culture”.

She said that the public would be “dismayed” by a series of breaches of Covid regulations in Downing Street.

“It is also the case that some of their involvement in some of these events was permitted given the attendance of senior leaders. The senior leadership at the centre, both political and official, must bear responsibility for this culture,” she added.

Ms Gray was due to investigate an “Abba party” that allegedly took place in the prime ministers’ Downing Street flat on the night of Lee Cain’s leaving do.

However the civil servant said that after the Metropolitan Police closed their investigation into the gathering she decided that “it was not appropriate or proportionate” to continue her own probe into the incident.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in