Civil servants 'objected' to Labour's final spending spree
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whitehall's most senior civil servants formally protested over a spending spree by Labour ministers during Gordon Brown's final months in power.
Departmental permanent secretaries took the "nuclear option" of asking outgoing ministers to put their decisions in writing by signing "letters of direction" officially authorising the expenditure.
The letters made it clear that the decisions – believed to have involved defence contracts, consultancies and procurement – were made not by civil servants, but by their political masters.
The unusual move was disclosed by the First Division Association union (FDA), which represents senior civil servants.
Jonathan Baume, its general secretary, told the BBC: "When a permanent secretary asks for a letter of direction from the minister, it is because they feel that a serious decision is being taken which they feel is not right."
Permanent secretaries require them because their position as the department's accounting officer makes them responsible for vouching for the propriety, regularity and value for money of its activities.
Asked how many letters were issued, Mr Baume replied "a number". Precise details were likely to be made public by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee when it reconvenes, he said.
He added: "The fact that a permanent secretary feels the need to ask for a letter of direction indicates... a serious disagreement about that particular decision."
His disclosure supports ministers' claims that the Labour administration was reckless with public money ahead of the election, leaving "black holes" in their budgets.
David Laws, the new Chief Secretary to the Treasury, has ordered a reappraisal of all major spending decisions taken since 1 January. He said the Government had discovered spending decisions were made by Labour ministers "against accounting officers' advice".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments