Cities may have to help fund HS2 rail link
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cities that are likely to benefit from the proposed HS2 high-speed rail link will be asked to contribute towards the cost of building the new line, it emerged tonight.
News of the potential levy – possibly raised through council tax – took some observers by surprise after it had been assumed the Government would bankroll the entire £33bn project, which will link Yorkshire and the North-west to London via Birmingham.
A Department for Transport command paper published last week said "parties who would benefit directly from opportunities and development" should contribute to the cost.
The Chancellor, George Osborne, claims the scheme will create growth and thousands of new jobs.
However, there has been a growing backlash from homeowners on the proposed route who fear they will be left out of pocket, as well as from environmentalists and some rail economists.
Manchester, Leeds, Nottingham, Sheffield and Derby, which will each receive new high-speed stations, are expected to be asked to contribute.
Paul Bayliss, the leader of Derby City Council, said there were potentially huge benefits. "If the cost of the investment means we have a £145m return and thousands of jobs it's a good use of resources," he said.
A spokesman for the Department for Transport said the contributions expected would depend on "local circumstances".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments