Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain invaded Iraq despite there being no threat from Saddam Hussein and the possibility of a peaceful resolution to the conflict, Sir John Chilcot has said.
The former civil servant has been investigating the Iraq War since 2009 and has released his report today.
Giving his summary statement in Westminster at 11am on Wednesday he said evidence of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in the country had been misrepresented by the British government and that there was not adequate post-conflict planning.
“The questions for the inquiry were whether it was right and necessary to invade Iraq in March 2003 and whether the UK could and should have been better prepared for what followed,” he said.
“We have concluded that the UK chose to join the invasion of Iraq before the peaceful options of disarmament had been exhausted. Military action at that time was not a last resort.
“We have also conclude that the judgements about the severity of the threat posed by Iraq’s WMD were presented with a certainty that was not justified.
“Despite explicit warnings the consequences of the invasion were underestimated and the planning for Iraq after Saddam Hussein were wholly inadequate.”
Sir John said it was not within his remit to rule on whether the Iraq War was legal or not.
He however said that the inquiry had found that the legal basis sought for military action in Iraq was "far from satisfactory".
On the issue of WMD Sir John said evidence showed Iraq would not have been able to create a nuclear weapon.
He said that while intelligence reports did feature WMD they did not support Government public claims of "vast stocks" and "an urgent and growing threat".
The inquiry also found that Tony Blair had been warned that the invasion of Iraq would embolden Islamic extremist terrorist groups. Large parts of Iraq are now under control of Isis.
He said the drivers of current chaos in the country had been “explicitly identified before the invasion”.
Overall, he said the Iraq Inquiry report is “an account of an intervention which went badly wrong, with consequences to this day”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments