Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour has accused a group of Conservative politicians of seeking special treatment after they were criticised in a case involving a disgraced former MP.
The most senior judge in England and Wales condemned them for seeking "to influence a judge" in the case of ex-Tory MP Charlie Elphicke.
He was jailed for two years in September for sexually assaulting two women.
A court is now considering whether or not to release character references given during his trial.
The office of the Lord Chief Justice responded after a group of Tory MPs and peers wrote to senior judges urging them to block the release of statements.
The letter was signed by MPs Sir Roger Gale, Adam Holloway, Bob Stewart and former cabinet minister Theresa Villiers, as well as Mr Elphicke's estranged wife Natalie, who succeeded him as MP for Dover MP.
Sent to senior judges and reportedly copying in the judge who will decide on the references, it warned publication could "deter" others from providing similar statements in future.
The office of the Lord Chief Justice for England and Wales said it was "improper" to seek to influence the decision of the judge.
Extracts published by the Guardian newspaper, said: "It is all the more regrettable when representatives of the legislature, writing as such on House of Commons notepaper, seek to influence a judge in a private letter and do so without regard for the separation of powers or the independence of the judiciary.
"It is equally improper to suggest that senior judges should in some way intervene to influence the decision of another judge.
"The independence of the judges extends to being free from interference by judicial colleagues or superiors in their decision-making.
"Judges must be free to make their decision independently of pressure or influence from all, including legislators."
Labour last night accused the group of believing they deserved to be treated differently from others.
Shadow attorney general Lord Falconer said: "There is not one rule for Tory MPs and another for everyone else when it comes to the courts.
"What goes on in court proceedings is public – and there is no special treatment for MPs.
"These Tory politicians should know better than trying to communicate with judges on House of Commons stationary in an attempt to put pressure on judges and should immediately apologise.
"Judges must be free to make their decisions independently of pressure or influence from anyone."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments