Chancellor hawkish on prospect of tax cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.KENNETH CLARKE, Chancellor of the Exchequer, yesterday delivered one of his clearest warnings yet that his ability to cut taxes before the next election would depend on the Government's success in cutting public spending.
He highlighted the 12 Treasury- led departmental deep reviews of expenditure and warned that 'bearing down on public spending is a relentless task'.
In terms that will be welcomed by Tory public spending hawks, Mr Clarke stressed that both he and his Thatcherite Treasury chief secretary, Michael Portillo, were agreed that 'controlling public spending is definitely not something that Chancellors and chief secretaries need only do once in a while.'
On Labour's attack on the tax increases from next month, Mr Clarke said: 'Tax and spending are the same issue. Labour are the high spending party and they are, therefore, the high taxing party.'
William Waldegrave, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, last night denied he had accused Lord Callaghan of lying in the House in 1967 over devaluation. On BBC1's Question Time, he said: 'I don't believe there is anything to apologise for, either on his part or mine. I am not impugning his honour.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments