Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cabinet rows `will wreck EU reform hopes'

Patricia Wynn Davies
Tuesday 21 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Deeper co-operation on defence, a leaner and fitter European Commission and tighter rules on devolved decision- making are set to be included in a shopping list of proposals being formulated by Douglas Hurd for next year's Inter-Governmental Conference.

But as preparatory work on the suggestions begins, the Foreign Secretary is understood to have delivered a stark warning to ministerial colleagues that further outbreaks of Cabinet squabbling will wreck Britain's chances of securing change at the conference on revising the Maastricht treaty.

A Whitehall source confirmed that Mr Hurd believes that the overall structure created by the treaty is right. But within that framework, he is said to favour seeing the Brussels commission reduced in size, and a possible change to the rotation of the EU presidency every six months.

He is also likely to support altering qualified majority voting rules to give bigger countries more weight, making the Commission and the European Court work better, renewed emphasis on rooting out fraud, and a tightening of subsidiarity - the principle that the EU only intervenes when action by individual states would be insufficient or ineffective.

One significant departure from his list of decentralising or efficiency suggestions concerns defence, the one area where a British opt-out would be unlikely and where Mr Hurd is understod to be preparing to back deeper integration.

While there is no question of accepting a common European defence policy dictated from Brussels, Mr Hurd wants to explore how EU member states could work together on defence issues in a way that would not undermine Nato. That will require detailed consideration of the future of the Western European Union, which includes only some EU states.

The final package of proposals, to be sent to the pre-IGC summit in June, is not expected to satisfy all Tory Euro-sceptics, still less the hard-line rebels who believe that the Maastricht treaty should never have been signed.

But while Mr Hurd is said to to be unmoved by the opposition of the nine die-hards without the Tory whip, he has emphasised that any breach of the Cabinet truce imposed by John Major after public wrangling over the single currency would prove highly counter-productive. Britain's EU partners would suspect the package had been cobbled together to stifle domestic divisions and the UK would come away empty-handed, he has warned.

Mr Hurd is also prepared, contrary to his earlier view, to contemplate a referendum on far-reaching constitutional issues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in