Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bus sale fee criticised

Wednesday 21 February 1996 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The City bank BZW was criticised yesterday for in effect setting its pounds 4m bonus for advising London Transport on the successful sale of London bus companies, writes John Rentoul.

The 10 bus companies were sold a year ago for pounds 233m, more than twice the pounds 100m "benchmark valuation" set by London Transport. BZW received pounds 5.07m, of which pounds 3.87 was a "success fee" based on the difference between the proceeds and the valuation - which was itself carried out by BZW.

Robert Sheldon MP, the Labour chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, said the arrangement seemed "strange", because the lower BZW set its valuation, the higher its success fee.

The National Audit Office, the public spending watchdog, concluded that, "overall, the sale was managed effectively". But its report warns: "There are risks in linking success fees to benchmark valuations as these may focus on a vendor's minimum expectations and will not necessarily reflect best estimates of likely proceeds."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in