Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Budget 2015: Benefits cap to be reduced to £20,000 for families outside London

In the capital the maximum figure claimable will drop to £23,000

Andrew Grice
Tuesday 07 July 2015 09:53 EDT
Comments
George Osborne on ‘The Andrew Marr Show’ where he reacted coolly to calls for the Living Wage to be extended
George Osborne on ‘The Andrew Marr Show’ where he reacted coolly to calls for the Living Wage to be extended (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The cap on the amount in benefits that can be claimed by one family will be reduced to £20,000 a year outside London and £23,000 in the capital.

George Osborne will announce the further squeeze, which will affect another 90,000 households in the UK, in his Budget on Wednesday. The Conservatives’ election manifesto pledged to reduce the current £26,000 cap to £23,000 nationally.

The Chancellor said: “It is not fair that people out of work can earn more than people in work so we are going to cut the benefit cap, as we said in our manifesto, to £23,000 in London. It will be lower in the rest of the country.”

He will point out that someone in work needs to earn £34,000 before tax to take home £26,000. People would need to earn £29,000 pre-tax to bring home £23,000, and £25,000 to take home £20,000. In London, two in five households earn less than £23,000.

Mr Osborne believes the introduction of the £26,000 cap has not resulted in the “ethnic cleansing” predicted by critics, who warned that people would be forced to move to less expensive areas. Government figures show that more than half the households affected by the cap were not caught by it 18 months later. Of those, 40 per cent had moved into work.

The Chancellor will extend a scheme under which local authorities can provide discretionary help to claimants with their housing costs. The cap does not cover benefits for the sick, disabled or pensioners.

The Budget will include a £30m package to speed up the adoption process for the 3,000 children in local-authority care waiting to find a family home, with a focus on harder-to-place children.

Mr Osborne said that it was a “tragedy” that so many children ready for adoption were waiting long periods to find new homes. More than half have spent more than 18 months in care, even though there is a surplus of potential adoptive parents.

The new money will waive fees local authorities must pay to adoption agencies for finding, assessing and matching adoptive parents and children. A £27,000 fee is paid for an adoptive parent found from outside a local authority’s border, either by another council or by one of 30 voluntary-sector adoption agencies.

Ministers believe the system is a disincentive to local authorities’ looking far and wide for potential parents for children in their care, particularly those who are the least likely to find a new home.

Mr Osborne said: “We cannot sit by when so many children are waiting so long to find a stable, loving home, particularly when there are parents out there who want to adopt. It just isn’t good enough. So I want to do all I can to make sure that there are as few barriers as humanly possible between children in care and their new parents.

“It shouldn’t matter where those families might live.”

David Cameron said: “The average time it takes to place a child with a new family has been falling and I am delighted we are able to offer this funding to try to ensure it falls further.”

The number of children adopted increased from 3,200 in 2010 to 5,050 in 2013-14. The average time it took to place a child with adoptive parents fell from an average 656 days in 2012-13 to 533 days in 2013-14.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in