Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Britain to defy prisoner voting ruling

 

Nigel Morris
Thursday 22 November 2012 14:30 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The rift between Britain and European judges over prisoner voting widened today after the Coalition Government – backed by Labour – insisted it had the authority to maintain the current ban on inmates taking part in elections.

Its stance put the country on a collision course with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), which has called for the UK to lift its current blanket ban.

Just one day before the deadline for Britain to respond to the ECHR ruling, the Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling, set out three alternatives for action. One – which the minister signalled he supported – was for the ban to remain in place with only minor amendments. The other options involve offenders sentenced to less than four years in jail or those sentenced to less than six months receiving the vote.

The options, detailed in draft legislation, will be considered by a parliamentary committee and then debated by MPs, although Mr Grayling has set no timetable for the moves. The Council of Europe, which oversees the ECHR, accused Mr Grayling of delaying tactics.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in