Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Britain's richest man offers Labour a £2m bail-out

Marie Woolf
Saturday 13 January 2007 20:44 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lakshmi Mittal, Britain's richest man, was last night reported to have offered Labour a £2m bail-out. The donation from the Indian-born billionaire would help the party stave off financial ruin caused by the cash-for-honours scandal.

The Sunday Times claimed the deal had been negotiated by Tony Blair and Lord Levy, currently on bail having been arrested as part of the police investigation into the affair. Mr Mittal was at the centre of an earlier financial sleaze row when it emerged that Mr Blair had backed one of his business deals following a previous donation.

A Labour spokesman said: "Mr Mittal has been a committed supporter of the party for many years and any financial gift from one of the world's most successful businessmen is very welcome."

Meanwhile, government lawyers have provided legal advice to officials over the cash-for-honours affair, prompting accusations of a serious conflict of interest. The Independent on Sunday has learnt that lawyers from the Treasury solicitors department have scrutinised the law on the abuse of honours and taken outside advice from leading barristers.

The involvement of government lawyers, who are accountable to the Attorney General, during the police inquiry is controversial because the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, will play a key role in deciding whether the case should go to court.

Senior Whitehall sources said that Edmund Lawson QC, a leading criminal barrister specialising in fraud, was among those asked for advice by the government lawyers after the police launched their investigation into cash for honours. Mr Lawson refused to comment. But one Whitehall source said: "The Treasury solicitors were looking at this early on and were unsure of a point of law. They sought Edmund Lawson's advice."

The revelation, previously denied by Whitehall, will be embarrassing to the Government. The Labour Party has now brought in outside legal advisers to officials, including some of Tony Blair's closest aides. Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, a Liberal Democrat peer, is to table questions about the involvement of government lawyers. "Why was taxpayers' money used to give legal advice which could benefit the Labour Party?" he asked.

Police are expected to pass a file of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service by the end of the month. The CPS has hired a second barrister to act on the case: David Perry QC will be joined by Robin McCoubrey, a criminal barrister, who will decide whether there is enough evidence to prosecute.

Lord Goldsmith's office said it did not know about the advice given by government lawyers, or how much it had cost the taxpayer. A spokesman said: "The Attorney General's Office has deliberately not been involved in any way with the response of officials, or any other persons, to that ongoing [police] investigation."

This week Sir Alistair Graham, chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, is expected to call for greater transparency in parties' declarations of funding. His report into the workings of the Electoral Commission is expected to be critical of Labour's conduct.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in