Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK presses ahead with breaking international law at crucial moment in Brexit trade talks

Government to enrage Brussels by overwriting Brexit withdrawal agreement

Jon Stone
Policy Correspondent
Friday 04 December 2020 03:06 EST
Comments
Brexit briefing: How long until the end of the transition period?

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The government is to press ahead with new legislation to overwrite the Brexit deal signed by Boris Johnson earlier this year, throwing trade talks with the EU into a new crisis.

With less than four weeks to go until a no-deal, Jacob Rees-Mogg on Thursday confirmed that ministers will reinsert controversial clauses removed by the House of Lords from their Internal Market Bill.

The House of Commons leader also announced the introduction of a new Taxation (Post Transition) Bill, which is expected to include other powers to overwrite parts of the withdrawal agreement.

Ministers have admitted that their plans break international law, and the EU has said such a move would be “curtains” for talks. The precise content of the taxation bill is not yet clear, however.

Hopes were raised that negotiators could be coming close to an agreement in London on Wednesday night after a large order of pizza was seen arriving at the door of their location – a sign of working into the night.

But nothing has yet emerged from negotiations, and diplomats say there are divisions among EU member states about how to proceed.

A group of harder-line leaders coalescing around Emmanuel Macron’s France reportedly want chief negotiator Michel Barnier to hold out for more concessions from the UK and allow a no-deal to occur if necessary.

But others, such as Ireland – which has more skin in the game – have warned against such a strategy.

The Irish foreign minister, Simon Coveney, told Ireland’s Newstalk Radio: “It’s the time to hold our nerve and trust [Barnier]. And I believe if we do that, there’s a good chance that we can get a deal across the line in the next few days. There will be no further extensions. There will be no extra time.”

Mr Coveney argued that waiting until after a no-deal “would mean significant disruption, costs, stress, and blame games between Brussels and London”.

“From an Irish perspective, we get caught in the cross-fires there,” he said, adding that it would be “a very dangerous assumption” to suppose there would be a trade deal signed in 2021.

Talks are understood to still be blocked on issues like governance, fisheries and fair competition. There were however reports of progress on the latter issue, which has dogged negotiations since the beginning of negotiations.

Yet by the evening on Thursday hoped of a deal appeared to again be fading.  A senior UK Government source said: "At the 11th hour, the EU is bringing new elements into the negotiation.

"A breakthrough is still possible in the next few days but that prospect is receding."

A previous deadline to get a deal sealed by mid-November is now long gone. Both sides had suggested that a text needed to be produced by this point in order to fully ratify it by the end of the year and avoid a no-deal – though it is no unheard of for free trade agreements to be introduced on a provisional basis.

The rising risk of no deal comes after the Commons Public Accounts Committee warned that the government simply had not done enough to prepare for the eventuality, with heavy disruption at channel ports extremely likely.

The National Audit Office has also said the government’s approach to Brexit means there will be economic disruption at channel ports whether there is a deal or not. The government says it is preparing for all eventualities, but would like a deal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in