UK will be ‘less safe’ after Brexit, says former Metropolitan Police chief
Sir Ian Blair rejects Priti Patel’s claim nation will made safer through ‘tougher’ post-Brexit powers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The former Metropolitan Police commissioner has said the UK will be less safe now the country has left the EU and the Brexit process is complete.
Sir Ian Blair’s remarks came after Priti Patel claimed the nation could be made safer after exiting the bloc by police and security agencies being handed “even tougher powers”.
Sir Ian rejected the suggestion, and pointed to the loss of the European Arrest Warrant and a major EU database which had been accessed more than 500 million times a year by British police.
“We’ve lost powers,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday. “We’ve lost full access to Europe-wide, real-time, interrogatable databases on criminal records, DNA, fingerprints, criminal intelligence.”
Sir Ian, the Met chief between 2005 and 2008, added: “The police have been quietly beating the drum, saying, ‘This is going to make us less safe’. And I’m afraid that is what is going to happen.”
Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, Ms Patel claimed banning foreign criminals who have served more than a year in jail from entering the UK would be among the “stronger powers” which could soon be given to British authorities.
However, the EU has made it clear that under the agreement struck before Christmas, the UK would not enjoy the same level of “facilities” on policing and security issues as before. An EU briefing note said the UK would no longer have “direct, real-time access” to sensitive databases.
One of the biggest changes for police and security officials will be the loss of the Schengen Information System II (SIS II) database, which officers had been able to search automatically alongside the Police National Computer.
Lord Ricketts, the former national security adviser, agreed with Sir Ian’s assessment on the post-Brexit security losses.
“I don’t see how we can be more safe by leaving a close partnership with nearest neighbours," he said.
The cross-bench peer, who chairs the Lords’ EU security and justice sub-committee, told Today: “I don’t think there’s a dividend [from Brexit] – we’re in damage limitation mode. We now need to … hope our operational forces and colleagues across Europe will be as helpful as possible to find workarounds.”
He added: “The home secretary talks about banning foreign criminals who have been more than a year in jail. Okay, that’s good. But that depends on knowing who has got that sort of criminal record. The EU has a database for that. We are no longer able to access it directly.”
Although the UK has also lost membership of EU law enforcement agency Europol following the transition period, it is hoped UK could still strike up an “associate” relationship with the agency in a similar way as the US.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments