Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: Government minister Liam Fox admits MPs can stop Britain leaving EU

'It would entirely be possible for amendments to a number of pieces of legislation to achieve that effect'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 05 December 2018 07:19 EST
Comments
Brexit: Government minister Liam Fox admits MPs can stop Britain leaving EU

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liam Fox says it will be “entirely possible” for MPs to halt Brexit, as he urged Conservative MPs to rally behind Theresa May’s deal.

The Commons could ambush and amend several bills that the government needs to pass “to make our exit from European Union effective”, the trade secretary told MPs.

Dr Fox pointed to the trade bill – currently stalled in parliament – which was needed to allow the UK to take its separate place at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), after Brexit.

Asked if the UK could end up with “no Brexit at all”, he replied: “It would entirely be possible for amendments to a number of pieces of legislation, we believe, to achieve that effect.”

Dr Fox told the international trade committee it was correct the motion passed on Tuesday night – giving MPs a say over what happens if the prime minister’s deal is rejected – was not binding.

But he added: “There are a number of pieces of legislation that we need to pass to be able to make our exit from the European Union effective.”

The Trade Bill was needed to “roll over” deals with other countries enjoyed through EU membership and to sign up to the WTO’s general procurement agreement (GPA), in order to buy goods and services.

“Certainly, it wouldn’t be possible to have the UK membership of the GPA without the legislation of the trade bill going through,” Dr Fox admitted.

Other leading Brexiteers have vowed to defeat Ms May’s deal next Tuesday, despite the warnings that doing so could lead to “no Brexit at all”.

But Dr Fox warned of an “attempt to steal Brexit from the British people, which I think would be a democratic affront”.

The motion, passed with the support of 26 rebel Tories, indicated that the Commons had “no intention of allowing no deal to happen”.

Urging Tory MPs not to risk the prise of leaving the EU, he said: “After last night’s vote, the chances are that we will end up not having Brexit.”

Catherine McKinnell, a Labour supporter of the People’s Vote campaign, criticised Dr Fox for saying that stepping back from the brink would be parliament “stealing” Brexit.

“Liam Fox is running scared of the people and their verdict on this fudge of a Brexit deal. A People’s Vote is about stopping a terrible deal being forced on all of us,” she said.

The trade secretary refused to say what the government’s “plan B” was, given the near certainty of a heavy defeat on the withdrawal agreement next week.

“The government's plan is to get this vote through the House of Commons,” he replied.

Describing the Irish border backstop as a “calculated risk to be taken”, Dr Fox admitted that alignment with Northern Ireland – to avoid regulatory checks – would hit hopes of new trade deals.

“The application of regulatory alignment would not make it possible to introduce any of those elements in trade agreements....services may be applicable, but not goods.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in