Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: Peers vote to guarantee no ‘checks and controls’ at Irish border, in fresh defeat for May

Ex-Tory chairman Chris Patten condemns 'blundering into Northern Ireland with a policy which is clueless and deluded with a can of petrol and a box of matches in the other hand'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 02 May 2018 12:57 EDT
Comments
House of Lords vote out proposal for 'checks and controls' at Irish border after Brexit

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peers have voted for tough legal protections to guarantee no “checks and controls” at the Irish border after Brexit, in another defeat for Theresa May.

The amendment gives teeth to the prime minister’s verbal promise of “no physical infrastructure” – which, it is feared, could become a magnet for terrorists – after some ministers cast doubt on it. Peers voted 309 to 242 in favour of the amendment - a majority of 67.

The defeat, the tenth on the main Brexit legislation, creates another headache for Ms May, who must decide whether to whip Tory MPs to overturn it in the House of Commons.

Anti-EU Tories have demanded the UK plough ahead with pulling out of the EU single market and customs union – and leave the question of future border checks to Dublin to decide.

But Chris Patten, the former Conservative party chairman, who put forward the Lords amendment, warned: “Two of the first murders in the Troubles were of customs officers.”

And, on the danger of provoking renewed violence, he told fellow peers: "It would be shameful if we did anything to make that more likely - it would be a stain on our history"

Hitting back at arch-Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg, who accused the Lords of “playing with fire” by inflicting Brexit defeats, Lord Patten warned: “I'll tell you what playing with fire is - blundering into Northern Ireland with a policy which is clueless and deluded with a can of petrol and a box of matches in the other hand.”

Chris Patten condemns 'blundering into Northern Ireland with a policy which is clueless and deluded with a can of petrol and a box of matches in the other hand'

The amendment compels the government to act in a way that is “compatible” with the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, which ended the Troubles.

It outlaws any infrastructure or checks that “did not exist before exit day and are not subject to an agreement between Her Majesty’s Government and the Government of Ireland”.

They would include “border posts, a requirement for customs or regulatory compliance checks, a requirement for security checks and random checks on goods vehicles”.

Despite the prime minister’s pledge, she has failed to rule out cameras at the border, once insisting she would not “give a running commentary”.

Meanwhile, the EU has rejected both UK proposals for new customs arrangements after Brussels – believing they would fail to deliver the promised open border.

David Davis, the Brexit Secretary, provoked fresh suspicions this week, when he hinted the UK would be happy to accept physical infrastructure, provided it was away from the border.

When it was put to Mr Davis that Britain had repeatedly promised no physical infrastructure, Mr Davis told peers: “At the border.”

Theresa May has promised a “robust” response in the Commons to the string of defeats in the Lords, but it is unclear if she will attempt to overturn them all.

Among them were a vote designed to keep the UK in a customs union and to bolster the “meaningful vote” on the prime minister’s exit deal.

It would ensure parliament, rather than the government, decides the next steps – prompting a protest by Liam Fox, the Trade Secretary, that it would allow Brexit to be delayed “indefinitely”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in