Downing Street was warned about Brexit border plan by head of Northern Ireland civil service

The head of Northern Ireland’s civil service has privately warned Downing Street that the UK’s plan for the Irish border fails to solve the major problems caused by Brexit.

In a leaked private letter to Theresa May‘s Brexit chief seen by The Independent, David Sterling said the plans in the UK’s position paper on the Irish border suffered from a number of practical problems and did not address certain “issues”.

He also raised concerns that Whitehall was not engaging closely enough with local NI officials with a good understanding of issues like the Good Friday Agreement and North-South cooperation.

The customs proposals, which the UK government has still been trying to sell to EU negotiators Brussels as recently as last week, were first laid out in an official position paper on Northern Ireland and customs published in August last year.

Days after the paper was released Mr Sterling wrote to Olly Robbins, at the time permanent secretary of the Brexit department, to voice his concerns about its content. Downing Street, where Mr Robbins now heads up the Brexit unit, however confirmed last week that UK negotiators are still arguing for the solutions proposed in the position papers in talks, stating that “the two proposals we have put forward remain the basis for our negotiation position”.

The same proposals interrogated by Mr Sterling in the letter were reportedly rubbished by EU officials during the talks and subjected to a “systematic and forensic annihilation” during meetings with the European Commission in Brussels.

The letter to Mr Robbins, dated 23 August 2017 says: “While the position papers have helpfully started a dialogue on movement of goods, many of the issues raised in June still require exploration.”

In the letter the top official in Northern Ireland also appears to be frustrated by a lack of involvement of local officials in drawing up the policy, stating that “we would like to see a more intensive and open engagement between Whitehall and NICS [Northern Ireland Civil Service] officials”. He goes on to list seven areas in which Whitehall had not been taking full advantage of local knowledge, including on the Good Friday Agreement, North-South cooperation, and trade.

Going into detail about the issues with the UK customs proposals, Mr Sterling said plans to exempt small businesses from customs suffered from issues of practicality.

“The dividing line between businesses of different sizes in Northern Ireland supply chains will undoubtedly be blurred. This could make it difficult to accurately define which businesses are exempt from customs processes,” he said.

“For example, bulk tankers owned or contracted by Irish milk processing firms collect raw milk from multiple farms in Northern Ireland before returning to Irish processing facilities.”

open image in gallery

He adds: “Small businesses trading on the island of Ireland may also be using inputs from outside these islands, or be part of an island of Ireland supply chain that ultimately sells into world markets.”

The NI executive civil service chief also highlighted concerns with plans for a “robust enforcement mechanism” to keep goods from crossing the border.

“The visibility and impact of a ‘robust enforcement mechanism’ to ensure goods not complying with the EU’s trade policy (whether through a lower tariff or diverging standard) stay in the UK is a significant challenge,” he said.

“The example of Turkey illustrates that customs duties are only one part of the picture and technical barriers can be equally disruptive to trade. Potential trade barriers created by diverging tariffs or regulatory standards are therefore a key area for ongoing discussion. DAERA is currently engaged with DEFRA on complex sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issues. “

open image in gallery

In a separate leaked document also seen by The Independent, an internal economic analysis drawn up by the Northern Ireland executive’s Department for the Economy warns that the province’s economy will suffer because of Brexit whatever solution is applied.

“There is no quick or simple solution to the land border,” the assessment, dated May 2017 says. “There is likely to be some negative impact on the economy whether border controls are sited at the land or sea border, at least in the short-to-medium term. The policy question is therefore how these impacts can be minimised and what transitional support is required.”

open image in gallery

The Government has declined to comment on the leaks.

There has still be little progress on the border question in talks this year, despite the opening of talks about the future relationship last week.

Under the Good Friday Agreement there can be no hard border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, and both sides agree that none should return.

The EU however says the customs union and single market must have external border checks to maintain their integrity. Commission negotiators effectively proposed moving the customs checks to the Irish Sea between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but Theresa May refused the approach after pressure from her allies in the DUP.

The draft withdrawal agreement as envisaged by the EU says Britain can come up with a specific solution to the border problem, remove the need for a hard border by negotiating a close trade relationship with the EU, or revert to a “backstop” option that would keep Britain in full alignment with relevant EU regulations.

But with Ms May having ruled out membership of the single market or a customs union the chance of solving the problem looks slim, barring a U-turn.

Speaking in the European Parliament in Brussels on Wednesday Guy Verhofstadt, the body’s Brexit coordinator, said he believed a solution to the border problem was needed by the end of June. UK Brexit secretary David Davis said earlier this week that he was aiming for October.

Mr Verhofstadt said negotiators “still have no proposal made by the UK side that could be a satisfactory solution for the problem”.