Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: UK must keep paying into EU budget if its banks want to trade in Europe, Germany to demand

Britain may be asked to keep paying after Brexit

Jon Stone
Brussels
Thursday 11 January 2018 05:09 EST
Comments
This is what will happen once Article 50 is triggered

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK will be asked to make substantial indefinite contributions to the EU budget after Brexit in exchange for British banks having access to Europe’s financial markets, under plans being considered in Brussels.

German government officials told the Bloomberg news agency that a trade deal with the UK could only include financial services if the UK makes payments to Brussels and continues to follow EU law.

The stance risks enraging Conservative Brexiteers, including Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who have made the end of payments to the EU budget after Brexit a red-line – but insisted the City would still be able to prosper once Britain has left.

Any payments would be on top of the £39bn divorce bill agreement by Theresa May, a figure that only covers existing British liabilities.

Earlier this week Michel Barnier, the European Commission’s chief negotiator, said in a dinner speech that a free trade agreement “may include provisions on regulatory cooperation” for financial services in line with those between the EU and Japan.

But he re-stated that with Britain leaving, its “financial service providers can no longer enjoy the benefits of a passport to the single market nor those of a system of generalised equivalence of standards”.

Over 5,400 British firms rely on passporting rights to bring in £9bn in revenue every year to Britain. The British Bankers’ Association (BBA) has said the loss of passporting would be “disruptive, costly and time-consuming”.

The demand from German officials comes as the EU announces a massive £11.5bn shortfall in its revenue from existing sources, “because of Brexit”.

“We have two main problems – we have a gap on the revenue side, and a gap on the expenditure side,” Günther Oettinger‏, the commissioner for the EU’s budget, told reporters in Brussels on Wednesday.

“The revenue gap is because of Brexit: following a transition phase, we will have a situation where the UK, a large country and net contributor, are leaving the EU.”

The fact the push for the UK to keep paying is coming from Germany is unsurprising, given that the burden of making up any shortfall would fall disproportionately on the large, wealthy member state.

The EU’s current annual budget is around €105 billion a year, or £92.8 billion. The largest gross contributors ahead of the UK are Germany, France, and Italy, who contribute around 21 per cent, 16 per cent, and 14 per cent respectively. The UK contributes 13 per cent. The UK had the second highest net contribution, however, behind Germany. Only nine of the 28 member states are net contributors to the redistributive budget.

On Monday Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, said the Commission’s “working hypothesis” would be that “our British friends will be leaving us” and that future spending had to be planned accordingly.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in