Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: UK will lose some EU extradition powers next year even if transition deal is agreed, Theresa May is warned

European Arrest Warrant will be undermined by new right for countries to refuse to surrender their own citizens – even during the transition period

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 11 July 2018 04:51 EDT
Comments
Brexsplainer: Living standards, wages and prices

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK will lose the automatic power to extradite criminals from some EU states next year even if a Brexit deal is agreed, Theresa May is warned today.

The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) will be undermined by a little-noticed clause allowing countries to refuse to surrender their own citizens, a House of Lords inquiry has found – even during the transition period.

The threat is revealed as the prime minister is warned it will “cost lives” unless she drops her red line to end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the UK after Brexit.

That refusal risks close integration with Europol, the EU’s law enforcement agency, and access to criminal databases, as well as the extradition powers of the EAW, peers say.

“Red lines won’t save people’s lives – getting agreement on effective police and security cooperation will,” said Lord Jay of Ewelme, the chairman of the Lords home affairs sub-committee.

The committee pointed out that, by mid-May, the Brexit talks had spent “little more than an hour discussing the future internal security relationship” – despite the prime minister insisting it was a priority.

“Neither side, however, has yet approached the negotiations in this spirit,” the report adds.

“The UK Government’s ‘red lines’, and the EU’s response, appear to have narrowed the scope for agreement. While we do not underestimate the difficulty of the issues facing both sides, the current mindset urgently needs to change.”

Ms May has called for a “deep and special partnership” with the EU after Brexit, in the form of a new treaty to “preserve” the current security cooperation.

But Lord Jay added: “The committee believes it is unlikely that such a treaty can be agreed in the time available.”

The UK government has described staying part of the EAW as “crucial” to prevent a return to “complex, lengthy and often frustrating old-fashioned processes”.

About 2,000 people a year are surrendered from the UK to the EU - and between 200 to 300 handed over to the UK by other EU countries.

However, Article 168 of the draft withdrawal agreement, struck in March, would “authorise EU27 States to refuse to extradite their nationals to the UK during the transition period”.

The committee was told that Germany, France, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia were most likely to invoke the clause during the transition period, due to run until the end of 2020.

It urged the government to “publish a contingency plan” to prepare for the possibility of not being able to secure an extradition.

The terms of the planned transition will also bar the UK from a governance role in Europol or data-sharing, making it “more difficult to secure long-term access”.

Long-term, the UK also risks crashing out of the Passenger Name Record Directive (information collection by air carriers), Prüm (sharing of DNA profiles, fingerprints and vehicle registrations), the Schengen Information System (alerts on suspected criminals – used 539m times by the UK in in 2017 alone) and the European Criminal Records Information System (information exchange on criminal convictions).

Lord Jay added: “The Government wants an overarching security treaty, which would to a large extent replicate the status quo. We don’t think this is achievable in the time available.

“It’s time for pragmatic compromises, on the UK side, and also on the EU side.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in