Press undermined rule of law in Brexit case coverage, says Supreme Court chief
Lord Neuberger tells BBC Radio 4 Today programme an attack on judiciary an attack on society
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The president of the Supreme Court has accused sections of the press of “undermining the rule of law” in coverage of the Article 50 case.
Lord Neuberger also claimed politicians could have been “quicker and clearer” in defending the judiciary after the High Court ruling that Theresa May did not have the power to start the Brexit process without the consent of Parliament.
The High Court's ruling led to sharp criticism of the three judges involved from Eurosceptic newspapers, and Lord Chancellor Liz Truss came under fire for failing to speak out quickly enough to defend them.
Lord Neuberger and his colleagues at the Supreme Court rejected a Government appeal against the ruling last month.
Lord Neuberger did not single out any politicians or newspapers, but told the BBC: “We were certainly not well treated.
“One has to be careful about being critical of the press, particularly as a lawyer or judge, because our view of life is very different from that of the media.
“I think some of what was said was undermining the rule of law.”
Asked whether politicians responded quickly enough to defend the judiciary and rule of law, Lord Neuberger told Radio 4's Today programme: “They were certainly vocal enough quickly enough after our hearing.
“After the (High) Court hearing, I think they could have been quicker and clearer. But we all learn by experience, whether politicians or judges. It's easy to be critical after the event.
“They were faced with an unexpected situation from which, like all sensible people, they learned.”
Lord Neuberger said undermining the judiciary also undermined the rule of law as judges were “the ultimate guardians” of it.
“The rule of law together with democracy is one of the two pillars on which our society is based,” he said.
“And therefore if, without good reason, the media or anyone else undermines the judiciary, that risks undermining our society.
“The press and the media generally have a positive duty to keep an eye on things. But I think with that with that power comes the degree of responsibility.”
Lord Neuberger, who is due to retire later this year, was speaking as the process was launched to appoint new judges to the Supreme Court, including his successor as president.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments