Boris Johnson's government has already spent £4.4bn on Brexit preparations, new figures reveal
The 22,000 civil servants working on EU withdrawal amount to 5 per cent of Whitehall total
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boris Johnson’s government has been accused of “keeping the public in the dark” over the true cost of Brexit, as new figures show that Whitehall departments have spent at least £4.4bn on preparations for withdrawal from the EU.
And there were warnings that the figure will only increase as the prospect looms of new border checks and controls at the end of the transition period in December.
The National Audit Office study found that more than 22,000 civil servants across 18 government departments were working on Brexit preparations by the end of last year, with the task consuming 12 per cent of all senior mandarins and 5 per cent of the total workforce. If the staff working on Brexit had been gathered in one department, it would have been the sixth largest in Whitehall.
The massive bureaucratic burden of Brexit reversed an austerity drive to reduce staffing numbers on Whitehall, with the total number of senior civil servants now 9 per cent higher than in 2010.
Around £1.9bn was spent on staffing, £288m on external consultants and lawyers and £1.5bn on new infrastructure, computer systems and advertising. Some £92m was classed as “losses”, including £50m paid to ferry companies and £33m to Eurotunnel as part of the abortive efforts to provide extra cross-Channel capacity in the case of hold-ups in Dover in a no-deal situation.
Brexit preparations soaked up £1 out of every £100 of planned government spending, at a time when many departments were experiencing real-terms cuts.
But the NAO figure does not include spending after 1 January this year, losses caused by diverting staff and resources away from departmental responsibilities or future costs such as the £30bn divorce settlement and the ongoing bill for additional red tape. And it does not cover additional costs to businesses and individuals from EU withdrawal.
The report said that departments had made “little” information public on how they spent the funds set aside for Brexit preparations, and NAO boss Gareth Davies said it exposed “limitations” in the way ministers monitored the spending.
The chair of the European Movement, former Conservative cabinet minister Stephen Dorrell, said the report highlighted “the astounding cost of Brexit that has been hidden from the public”.
“The lack of detail and limited data contained in the report is indicative of the secretive way that the government is delivering Brexit,” said Mr Dorrell.
“Boris Johnson is insisting on delivering one of the greatest constitutional changes in half a century behind smoke and mirrors, without the democratic accountability we expect of our government.”
The chair of the influential House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, Meg Hillier, said: “The public has been kept in the dark as to what the government has been doing. Data is limited, and the Treasury seem unconcerned by the lack of transparency.”
And Liberal Democrat Brexit spokesman Alistair Carmichael called on ministers to “come clean” on exactly how the Brexit billions were spent.
"Billions of pounds have been thrown away in a bid to paper over the Tories' Brexit mess,” said Mr Carmichael. “The public have a right to know where it is all going. In the face of major floods and the coronavirus threat, we have to ask if the government knows its own spending priorities.”
Chancellors Philip Hammond and Sajid Javid made a total of £6.3bn available to government departments and devolved administrations between June 2016 and March 2020 to prepare for EU exit, including £2bn for the eventuality of no-deal.
With no-deal Brexit still a strong possibility, and prime minister Boris Johnson indicating that he may decide as early as June to quit on World Trade Organisation terms, it is unclear how much of this money will eventually be spent.
Naomi Smith, the chief executive of the Best for Britain campaign, said: "An awful lot of money has been spent by government departments on the process of leaving the EU.
"And those costs will only soar as we approach June without the government budging at all on its negotiating stance.
"We've spent billions on this when to be frank there are other priorities we should be focusing on. With coronavirus looking like it will wreak havoc for months to come, let's support our NHS at this critical time instead."
Biggest Whitehall spenders on Brexit preparations were the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which spent £871m; the Home Office (£803m); and HM Revenue & Customs (£748m). The Cabinet Office reported a communications spend of £49m, including funding for the "Get ready for Brexit" campaign in the run-up to the 31 October deadline for withdrawal, which was missed.
Major infrastructure spending included the Operation Brock system to manage traffic disruption in Kent, which was forecast to reach £69m by the end of 2019-20.
Eleven departments spent more than their allocation in 2017-18 and 12 in 2018-19, forcing them to divert a total of £301m from existing budgets. More than 1,500 civil servants were moved between departments as part of the process.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments