Boris Johnson admits his TV comments were 'a factor' in US ambassador's resignation
But Tory leadership favourite insists his much-criticised comments were 'misrepresented to Kim'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boris Johnson has admitted his TV comments on Kim Darroch were “a factor in his resignation” – but insisted the former US ambassador was given a false account.
The favourite in the race for No 10 insisted Sir Kim had not – as widely reported – watched the programme, but merely been told that Mr Johnson had failed to back him.
However, revealing a conversation between the pair, Mr Johnson said: “He said that what somebody had relayed to him had certainly been a factor in his resignation.”
But, being grilled by the BBC’s Andrew Neil, he added: “I think that, unfortunately, what I said on that TV debate was misrepresented to Kim.”
Until now, Mr Johnson has insisted the resignation was not connected to his TV appearance – dismissing protests, including from Tory MPs, that the diplomat had been “thrown under a bus”.
Sir Kim quit after his savaging by Donald Trump and within hours of the Tory leadership favourite refusing, repeatedly, to say he would keep the ambassador in his post.
Alan Duncan. a junior foreign office minister, described his behaviour as “contemptible”, but Mr Johnson had called the allegation of a connection “bizarre”.
In his interview with Mr Neil, Jeremy Hunt, the underdog in the race, refused to say the UK would leave the EU “by Christmas” – despite Mr Johnson’s vow to be out by 31 October.
“I’m not going to give you those commitments,” the foreign secretary replied, arguing MPs could yet thwart any attempt to carry out a no-deal Brexit on Halloween.
Pressed again on if Brexit would happen “before Christmas”, Mr Hunt replied: “I would expect so, yes,” – before leaving open the possibility of membership continuing into 2020.
He underlined his slim chances of success, by admitting his “worry” was that Conservative members would “vote with their hearts instead of their heads”.
However, fewer than half of Tory members have returned their leadership ballots, ahead of the end of the race on 22 June, according to an internal update given this week.
Turnout is said to be between 45 per cent and 50 per cent – a much lower figure than claims, by Mr Johnson’s supporters, that at least two thirds of the 160,000-strong membership had voted already.
In his interview, Mr Johnson faced the accusation that he would be “craven” to Mr Trump, given their friendship and the way he sided with the US president over the Darroch affair.
He called the suggestion “ridiculous”, arguing he had stood up to Mr Trump when he “saw fit to insult London”, in his time as the capital’s mayor.
But Mr Johnson refused, five times, to repeat his 2015 criticism that Mr Trump was “stupefyingly ignorant” over his call for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
“You’re not going to answer, are you,” Mr Neil said, having suggested that “people worry will you be as craven if you were prime minister”.
Mr Johnson said he did not want to prorogue – or suspend – parliament to ram through a no-deal Brexit through, but, again, he would not rule it out.
The exchanges were criticised by Ian Murray, a Labour supporter of the People’s Vote campaign, who said: “This has been the week where we have been able to peer into what the future would be if Brexit is delivered by a prime minister Boris Johnson.
“His refusal to stand up for our impartial civil servants shows he would be craven in the face of a bullying Donald Trump.”
Mr Neil also took Mr Johnson to task over his claims Article 22 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) would allow the UK to continue to trade with the EU tariff-free for up to 10 years in the event of a no-deal Brexit.
After conceding any such agreement would be subject to agreement by both parties, the former foreign secretary attacked what he described as “BBC-generated gloom” when Mr Neil suggested any such plan was “mission impossible”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments