Boris Johnson report in full: Read all 30,000 words of Partygate committee findings
Damning report finally arrives in haze of fresh controversy stoked by former prime minister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The long-awaited investigation by MPs on the privileges committee into whether Boris Johnson lied to parliament over the Partygate scandal has finally been published.
The findings come more than a year after the inquiry was first commissioned by the former prime minister, in a move which failed to prevent his unceremonious ousting from Downing Street less than three months later, swiftly followed by that of his immediate successor.
Despite Mr Johnson dramatically stepping down as an MP days before the 30,000-word report was published, thereby averting the risk of an embarrasing by-election triggered by its findings, the former PM still saw to it that the document arrived in a haze of controversy.
Having already infuriated the committee with his accusations of a “kangaroo court”, Mr Johnson launched a “desperate” last-ditch attempt to discredit the report on the eve of publication, calling for senior Tory Sir Bernard Jenkin to resign from the committee over fresh claims that he had also breached lockdown rules.
Read our live coverage of reaction to the partygate report here: Ex-PM’s disgrace as lies finally laid bare
Read the report in full below:
The 106-page document covers both the assurances the former prime minister gave to MPs over gatherings in Downing Street during the coronavirus pandemic and his subsequent criticism of the Privileges Committee tasked with investigating his behaviour.
Here are its key points:
- Mr Johnson misled the House of Commons by claiming that Covid-19 rules and guidance were followed at all times in Number 10 on four separate occasions;
- He also misled MPs by failing to tell the Commons “about his own knowledge of the gatherings where the rules or guidance had been broken”;
- Claiming he relied on “repeated reassurances” that rules had not been broken also amounted to misleading the House;
- Mr Johnson misled the House by insisting on waiting for former civil servant Sue Gray’s report to be published before he could answer questions in the House, when he had “personal knowledge which he did not reveal”;
- His claim that rules and guidance had been followed while he was present at gatherings in Number 10 when he “purported to correct the record” in May 2022 also amounted to misleading the House;
- The former prime minister was “disingenuous” with the committee in a number of ways, including by adopting a “narrow and restricted interpretation” of the assurances he gave to the House
- As well as being reckless, Mr Johnson intended to mislead the House, the report concludes. Many aspects of his defence were “not credible” and taken together they “form sufficient basis for a conclusion that he intended to mislead”;
- In deliberately misleading the Commons, the then-Conservative Party leader committed a “serious contempt” of Parliament, made all the more grave because he was the most senior member of Government at the time;
- Mr Johnson committed an “egregious breach of confidentiality” by revealing the contents of the warning letter he received from the committee when he resigned as an MP on Friday;
- His “vitriolic” attack on the committee and its work amounts to “an attack on our democratic institutions”, which, taken together with the confidentiality breach, is a “serious further contempt”;
- If he had not pre-emptively resigned, the committee said it would have recommended a 90-day suspension from the Commons;
- Mr Johnson should not be granted a former member’s pass – which is normally available to former MPs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments