Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson election promise to rescue struggling towns in confusion as £3.6bn pot must be shared with cities

Embarrassed minister forced to defend launching his 'countrywide town tour' in Wolverhampton – a city of 250,000 people

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 09 January 2020 09:01 EST
Comments
Robert Jenrick admits 'towns fund' must be shared with cities

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson’s election promise to rescue struggling towns has been thrown into confusion after it emerged a £3.6bn pot must be shared with cities.

The admission came as an embarrassed minister defended launching his “countrywide town tour” in Wolverhampton – a city of 250,000 people which was awarded city status a full 20 years ago.

Robert Jenrick, the communities secretary who was born and educated in Wolverhampton, denied he had blundered, saying he was fully aware it “was a town and is now a city”.

But he argued it and other “smaller cities” also deserved to receive up to £50m each to improve transport and parking and to convert empty shops into housing.

Interviewed on Sky News, Mr Jenrick was told the announcement appeared “confused” and asked – given the ‘towns fund’ was unveiled in Wolverhampton – if he even realised it was a city.

“I went to Wolverhampton because Wolverhampton is one of recipients of the towns fund,” he argued.

The criteria were “‘not as crude” as whether a place was a town or city, but was “based on population size,” he argued – although Wolverhampton is the 11th biggest city in England.

The Conservative manifesto had promised the cash would go into “regenerating towns”, with residents given the power to make them “great places to shop and eat”.

The prime minister then went on to stun Labour by seizing many long-held constituencies in towns in the North and Midlands, including Bury, Darlington, Bishop Auckland, Worksop and Grimsby.

Tim Farron, the former Liberal Democrat leader, accused ministers of “duplicity” for political gain.

“Just how out of touch is this Conservative government with our communities and their needs?” he told The Independent.

“Tory ministers are prepared to ignore hundreds of under-served towns to instead fund larger cities for political expediency.”

And Claire Darke, the mayor of Wolverhampton, said: “My concern would be that this competition is politically motivated and that they are doing it because there is a tough fight next year to vote for regional mayor for the West Midlands and they are trying to attract support.”

The fund will hand up to £50m each to 100 ‘towns’, with Mr Jenrick announcing a separate ‘Town of the Year’ government competition.

The minister said the cash would help with projects to boost walking and cycling into town centres, improved car parks, park-and-ride projects and to enable more people to live in centres.

Asked why the West Midlands city had been called a town, Mr Jenrick said: “Most people in Wolverhampton do call the city centre the town centre.

“The most important thing here is we are going to be investing, as no government has in the past, in towns to ensure they get good quality transport, better skills, culture and to get our high streets back up.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in