Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: Tory election win will leave MPs with three or four months to stop no-deal, says expert

Request for longer transition period must be made by June 2020 – and MPs cannot ‘trigger the asking for an extension’

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 30 October 2019 08:35 EDT
Comments
MPs will have only 3-4 months to avert crash-out Brexit if Johnson wins academic warns

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UK will have only “three or four months” to avert a crash-out Brexit if Boris Johnson wins the election and passes his deal, a leading academic has warned.

And MPs will be powerless to prevent the prime minister pursuing a no deal at the end of 2020 if he chooses, the Commons Exiting the European Union Committee was told.

Mr Johnson has insisted the post-Brexit transition period will end in December 2020, regardless of whether he has agreed a new trade and security agreement with the EU by that deadline.

But Catherine Barnard, the professor of EU Law at Cambridge University, warned it was “very unlikely” a complex new deal would be agreed by then – and that an extension to the transition must be requested by June 2020.

“That process of requesting an extension, of course, will have to happen within three or four months of us having left,” she told the MPs.

And she warned: “There is a process by which parliament can scrutinise whether a request should be made, but not actually trigger the asking for an extension.”

One Tory Brexiteer on the committee said the process sounded “depressingly complicated” and questioned whether it would be “easier to leave without a deal”.

The controversy lay behind the pleas, by Tony Blair and others, for Labour to stiffen the legal protections against a no deal, rather than agree to the pre-Christmas election now to be held on 12 December.

Suspicions that a no deal at the end of 2020 remains the aim of hardline Tory MPs were first prompted when one said it was their reason for backing Mr Johnson’s deal.

Ms Barnard said the UK was on course to leave the EU on 1 February, if the withdrawal agreement bill is passed following a Conservative victory.

Eleven months “is very short indeed to negotiate an international trade agreement, especially one of the ambition and scope that the political declaration indicates”, she pointed out.

Christopher Chope, a Conservative hard Brexit supporter, suggested: “It would probably be easier to leave without a deal on 31 January, rather than get ourselves into the ‘neverendum’ of trying to get a future political relationship sorted out within such a short space of time.”

Extraordinarily, the political declaration agreed by the UK and EU says the future negotiations “will convene at a high level in June 2020” – the deadline for making the extension decision.

Jack Simson Caird, of the Bingham Centre, an independent research institute, said the negotiating mandate would have to be approved by parliament first.

“It might be that the negotiations haven’t even properly begun in a way that could lead to them being concluded by the end of the transition period,” he warned.

The controversy comes after Matt Hancock, the health secretary, admitted the Conservative general election manifesto may not contain firm proposals to solve the social care crisis.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in