Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal would swipe £1,100 from every person in the UK every year, devastating new analysis says

'This corresponds to roughly the size of Wales’s economic output – or £70bn a year'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 30 October 2019 04:10 EDT
Comments
Chancellor Sajid Javid not worried despite shrinking economy

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal would swipe £1,100 from every person in the country every year, according to a devastating new economic analysis.

The annual loss from pulling the UK out of the EU single market and customs union – around £70bn a year – would be the equivalent of the entire output of Wales, it has concluded.

The damage would be so great that the UK would be better off continuing with the huge economic uncertainty from the ongoing Brexit crisis, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said.

Annual government borrowing would balloon to also around £70bn – or 3 per cent of GDP – taking the UK back to a deficit level not seen since about 2014.

The respected think-tank also said its conclusions hinted at the reasons behind the refusal by Sajid Javid, the chancellor, to publish the Treasury’s economic forecasts for the agreement.

“I would ask you to draw your own conclusions from that,” Jagjit Chadha, its director, told The Independent.

In a now-notorious comment two weeks ago, Mr Javid dismissed fears over the deal agreed with the EU, saying “It’s self-evident what we have achieved with this deal is the right thing for the economy.”

But the NIESR has concluded lost trade and lower migration will hit productivity, delivering the 3.5 per cent annual GDP loss within 10-15 years of Brexit going ahead.

That will be piled on top of a £50bn loss since the Brexit referendum nearly three-and-a-half years ago, which has cut 2.5 per cent from national output.

“It means future trade will face significant higher barriers, both to goods and services,” said Arno Hantzsche, the organisation’s principal economist, of the agreement on the table.

“That means we would not expect there to be a boost to the economy. In fact, our estimate is that, in the long run, the economy will be some 3.5 per cent smaller every year.

“This corresponds, in today’s money, to roughly the size of Wales’s economic output – or £70bn a year, or more than £1,000 per person per year.”

The NIESR said the current economic loss from the Brexit uncertainty – cited by ministers as the reason for the sluggish economy – was lower at 1-2 per cent per year.

“The estimated loss of GDP so far is because businesses generally have not been investing, whereas the loss in the future will be cause certain types of economic activity in the UK will be no longer profitable,” its report added.

Business groups have strongly criticised the new agreement, because – unlike Theresa May’s ‘blind’ Brexit – it paves the way for a hard exit, outside the customs union and without economic alignment.

The NIESR also warned economic policy was “in disarray”, after next week’s Budget was cancelled, saying: “We have no budget, spending review and published forecasts.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in