Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blair wants to overhaul human rights laws

Anthony Barnes
Saturday 13 May 2006 19:47 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Prime Minister is planning a shake-up of human rights legislation after claims that criminals' rights are being put before those of their victims. Tony Blair wants the Government to be able to override court rulings to protect public safety. The move follows a number of controversial decisions by the courts, most recently when a judge last week prevented the deportation of Afghan refugees who had hijacked a plane to Britain.

The plans are revealed in a letter to the new Home Secretary John Reid which says the Government needs to look at whether legislation is needed to address situations where courts overrule the Government in a way inconsistent with other interpretations of the European Convention on Human Rights across the EU.

This could mean amending or suspending the Human Rights Act.

Mr Blair told today's News Of The World: "We are entitled in Parliament to still say we are deliberately going to override the Human Rights Act. From our perspective we would like to - in circumstances when it is clear we are taking a definitive decision that the human rights of the victim come first. Human rights do matter, but the point is whose human rights?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in