Benefit savings could exact a high cost
Welfare cuts: Plans to save pounds 1bn will affect thousands
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NICHOLAS TIMMINS
More than one million lone parents, thousands of young people leaving home and up to 150,000 recipients of industrial injuries benefits are to be hit in a fresh round of savings, which will in time take almost another pounds 1bn a year out of the social security budget, according to the leaked correspondence from Peter Lilley to William Waldegrave, Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
The freeze in lone parent premium and one parent benefit will hit well over one million single parents - depriving them of a 3.9 per cent inflation- linked increase next April. In addition, the pounds 5.20-a-week lone parent premium paid to single parents on income support will be abolished for new cases.
The real terms cut in the value of benefits marks something of a departure for Mr Lilley, the Secretary of State for Social Security, who has argued that benefit rates "by and large" are "not hugely generous" and that they "don't enable people to live the life of Riley." In the main, his approach has been to restrict the numbers eligible for benefit rather than reduce the individual amounts paid.
The pressure for fresh cuts in social security is such, however, that Mr Lilley has agreed to savings which rise from pounds 400m next year to pounds 1bn a year in three years time, on top of the pounds 4bn that the Government has already removed from the social security budget by the end of the century - chiefly by introducing the revamped incapacity benefit, the jobseeker's allowance, and cuts to housing benefit.
These, however, look set to go further, with Mr Lilley suggesting that in future those aged under 25 could be pressured to live in bedsits, flats or hostels, rather than in self-contained flats of their own, by restricting their housing benefit payments to the cost of shared accommodation. That would produce savings of pounds 10m next year, rising to pounds 65m a year by 1999, according to the letter.
The most controversial saving, however, will come from the changes to lone parent payments. Almost one million people receive the non-means- tested one parent benefit of pounds 6.30 a week, which is to be frozen. The means-tested lone parent premium, worth pounds 5.20 a week and paid to people on income support, will also be frozen, while new claimants will no longer receive it.
Mr Lilley has also offered a saving on industrial injuries benefit that will cut the numbers receiving the reduced earnings allowance. That allowance - which makes up the difference between what a worker earned before their injury and what they can earn now - was abolished for new claimants in 1990, unless their injury occurred before then. It pays up to pounds 38.12p a week to 150,000 claimants, but Mr Lilley's officials have now found a way of increasing the numbers who move off the supplement to the much lower retirement allowance. This pays only a maximum of pounds 9.53 a week, or a quarter of the earnings allowance if it was less than the pounds 38 maximum. The housing charity Shelter protested that youngsters would be hard- hit.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments