BBC election debate: Johnson forced to confront comments from father of Jack Merritt during discussion on security
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boris Johnson has been confronted with remarks from the father of a man killed in the London Bridge terror attack, as Jeremy Corbyn tackled the prime minister on the impact of austerity on policing.
Dave Merritt, whose son Jack was one of two people killed by convicted terrorist Usman Khan, condemned the prime minister earlier this week for using the attack as justification for a series of tougher criminal policies.
Challenged on the remarks during the BBC leaders’ debate – just six days before the general election – the prime minister said he had “huge sympathy” for both victims’ families. “It was a terrible thing,” he said.
He added: "But I still think it's wrong that someone like Usman Khan who was sentenced 21 years or 16 years plus five on licence should have been out automatically on eight years."
The Labour leader described the attack last Friday – resulting in the deaths of 25-year-old Jack Merritt and 23-year-old Saskia Jones – as “utterly appalling”.
He went on: “I was very moved by what Jack Merritt’s father said about what his son was trying to do. That he wanted a society where you did address the huge problems where somebody committed awful acts like that - yes of course you must imprison them, yes you must rehabilitate them if you can.
He added: “We need security on our streets. Security doesn’t come on the cheap and if you cut the number of police officers… then we all pay a price with our own security.”
Following the London Bridge attack, the Conservatives vowed to toughen terror sentences and stop criminals entering the UK from the EU. They also launched a crackdown on people convicted of terrorism offences who had been released earlier.
But that prompted a furious response from Mr Merritt, who wrote in an article this week: “If Jack could comment on his death – and the tragic incident on Friday 29 November – he would be livid.
He added: “We would see him ticking it over in his mind before a word was uttered between us. Jack would understand the political timing with visceral clarity.
“He would be seething at his death, and his life, being used to perpetuate an agenda of hate that he gave his everything fighting against. We should never forget that. What Jack would want from this is for all of us to walk through the door he has booted down, in his black Doc Martens.
"That door opens up a world where we do not lock up and throw away the key. Where we do not give indeterminate sentences, or convict people on joint enterprise. Where we do not slash prison budgets, and where we focus on rehabilitation not revenge. Where we do not consistently undermine our public services, the lifeline of our nation."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments