Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Backbenchers attack committee gag on Birt

Ben Russell
Wednesday 30 January 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair was under fire from Labour backbenchers yesterday for refusing to allow his transport adviser Lord Birt to face questions from a committee of MPs.

Gwynneth Dunwoody, chairman of the transport select committee, attacked Number 10 for turning down a request for the former BBC director general to give evidence to MPs next week. MPs have started a full-scale inquiry into the Government's 10-year transport plan, insisting that advisers involved in shaping policy should be subject to questioning from elected MPs.

Officials from the Highways Agency and the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions have been seconded to assist the peer in his "blue sky" research into transport up to the year 2020. Senior civil servants also meet Lord Birt weekly in a steering group to guide his research.

Ms Dunwoody said: "If Lord Birt and the forward strategy unit are involved in policymaking, then they must be accountable to Parliament. If they are not involved in policymaking we question their value."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in